"Origin of species" and ICO-TIN – the difference between Earth and Recreation

On November 24, 1859, the Day of the “Origin of Species” was published, and the world was presented with a unique theory of existence, the causes of existence, and the processes of generation, evolution, and survival of various species. The most ancient and with eternal longevity were amoebae and others of this kind. They went through all the ups and downs; through the rough phases represented by mother nature.

“The Origin of Species” was the only book of its kind written for anyone to read and understand anyone. It was liked and popular among all classes, be it students, researchers, scholars or far-sighted. It was popular all over the world thanks to its neutral approach and comprehensive language. The theories are still applicable, and this book has proved useful for future biological and relative theoretical experiments and practical applications regarding the origin and evolution of various species on planet Earth.

The relative similarity between the “origin of species” and the blockchain:

If Satoshi Nakamoto – “Darwin” crypto-era, and cryptography – “the origin of species”, given the fact that it all exists in the world in which we all live, and has a significant impact around the world. Eventually it was understood, though by almost the whole world, however, it proved to be a popular and widely accepted phenomenon.

While other cryptocurrencies have failed to survive and have lost their existence in the winds of change and evolution, like previous “single-celled” organisms, to amoebae. Bitcoin, which is the most suitable species, has become the “amoeba” of this relative hypothesis. It has become a cause, an inspiration and a reference point for other, more complex organisms. These organisms, such as Ethereum, were introduced with a new execution concept that was ICO (the original coin offering). Relatively natural principles of development, nutrition, growth and reproduction were widespread and known to all.

Scientific and religious discussions during and for a long time:

The “origin of species” has spawned various heated debates, scientific-practical and religious-Orthodox, and it looks like a blockchain. The Orthodox community or the dominant religious groups at the time were not flexible enough to allow new theories to dominate the society they had dominated for a long time. Similarly, the financial system, which has been dominant since society was introduced with money and currency, does not want to change and is firmly in line with set trends for a couple of centuries. Perhaps he fears the importance he may lose if his principles are replaced.

The book continued to conspire for a long time, and this rule is popularly referred to as the “eclipse of Darwinism,” that is, from the 1880s to the 1930s. Despite all the evidence and explanations, the “responsible” “origin of the species” lasted quite a long time. People were forbidden to talk about “Darwin’s theory” in public or on social platforms. The current time frame can be compared to the same period of rule, when people could not talk about “cryptography” in financial meetings or forums related to centralized banks or on financial social platforms, where the monopoly is the steward of the big old banks and loans. companies.

Coexistence and definition of “EVOLUTION”:

In addition, a number of other enthusiasts have emerged, with new icons turning into cryptocurrencies on stock exchanges, and similar theories about world evolution after the “origin of species”. Then Darwin’s theory was found, which proved practical and applicable, as well as useful for new biological results. Similarly, the concept of ICO (primary coin offering) was introduced to the world. This led to a revolution, opening the door for the participation of “non-technical” individuals in the crypto-world.

As before, the concept was questioned, challenged, and unfortunately due to several irregularities and initial failures in the execution of some applications (which, although there was a very small ratio compared to successful ones), critics got a chance to celebrate.

ICO-TIN, AFTER “DARWIN”:

The “origin of species” was later comparatively discovered to be almost the definition and explanation of the evolution of different species on earth. It was also explained that what is the difference between the habitats of the earth and other planets, probably because of which LIFE may not have been possible anywhere. Darwin did not speak of it; as well as Nakamoto, about “ICO”.

World authorities and “religious” organizations have challenged the ICO as a concept. These “religious” (rigid to principles and unhappy to change) financial systems have their limits. They give tough assignments for each new integration or experiment, implementation or invention in the system. These mandates tend to become a “dead end” for the ICO these days.

The ICO-TIN should present a picture in order to enable the ICO to open a “dead end” for the ICO, as well as to receive further explanations and integration of this policy of “firm mandates”. To provide an indispensable habitat for ICOs and make “Earth” different from other planets, ICO-TIN makes a safe gap between progressive ICOs and “religious” old financial systems.

ICO-TIN. Environment and ocean.

The difference between the other planets is obviously in the availability of air and water around the inhabited environment. As Darwin puts it, “life finds its way.” Of course, it was. ICO-TIN has found a way to take ICO to the next level and make things safe and mutually beneficial.

The challenges and how ICO-TIN creates a mutually beneficial platform for people, as well as the teams representing ICOs, can be analyzed and understood in the study explained below.

The tasks of launching an ICO are now as follows:

1) A smart contract has its limits. It can either reveal the address to which the cryptocurrency needs to be transferred, it is a unique address associated with a particular ICO, and once the address is disclosed to all or at least a large number of people who are interested in that ICO, they can always log in to make payments.

2) As long as the contract is valid, the larger the number is considered effective, but the more codes it has, the more gas is consumed per transaction. Thus, making a smart contract for a long time is not at all cost effective.

3) At the moment when the ICO cannot accept more than 14 transactions per second, an AUCTION situation arises. In this situation, the set parameters call for the completion of the transaction in any case, regardless of the price of gas.

4) When such a scenario is created, an SPF or single-point fault occurs.

5) Compliance is another article that needs to be taken care of, where two things need to be considered.

The first is the KYC process, which is more complex than the others because it has to be integrated with image loading, making the system quite prone and vulnerable to hacking and malware.

The second is accounting, which is again a big task for regulation and control, because the exchange has different cryptocurrencies, and one does not want to change the method of payment to any medium, which he often does not use.

6) Strategy development should be very planned and flawless. It covers three aspects, and now these three aspects have been defined by traditional ICO methods. These three ways:

AUCTION – if a set of models judges which transaction should be prioritized, based on the fact that this transaction was backed by a higher price for GAS

BOUNTY – an award is usually given to participants or participants for introducing more people to a program or ICO. This generosity was the number of tokens quite often.

GAS – gas has been a very important factor when it comes to launching an ICO because there are so many transactions, and even a transaction in very small quantities is completed after consuming GAZ, which costs many times the same amount.

Application and need of ICO-TIN

ICO-TIN is the answer to all challenges for someone who has been busy developing their technical and cryptographic skills and has never been so interested in being skilled or smart as to confront the problems of the underworld.

It is more about a “professional” approach. Because someone pays for something, he should know it perfectly well. Everyone could get a haircut, but we prefer the barber because he knows his job better. This explains the need for a professional ICO-TIN package.

It is an Enterprise solution for new ICO launches and provides a customized package that includes both ICO launches and marketing.

The solutions to the issues were as follows:

1) a reasonable contract will be unavailable; a unique address will never be disclosed to any of the participants. Parallel and more secure payment methods will be implemented.

2) The easiest way to make payments will be that with any payment method (FIAT and BTC currencies as well) you will need to buy USD in the system, and its further purchase will be governed by these USD.

3) This complete system will be an “OFF-CHAIN” program, in any case integrated with the system; thus, there will be no gas consumption transactions during the transactions made by the participants

4) However, the payments to be made by the system will be regulated in accordance with the periodic cost-effective prices of GAZ, and thus it will be a system of minimum liability for back and forth transactions.

5) There will be no auctions for transactions, and therefore gas consumption will not be a problem in any case.

6) KYC and account management will be done differently, with a system that will not directly match the ICO, so it will not threaten the ICO if image uploads are required.

7) Accounts will be managed seamlessly by individuals and this can be done more efficiently.

Bringing the “origin of species” to a new level although it was a challenge for biologists and others associated with it, but they could not allow Darwin’s work and contribution to go in vain. Similarly, it was a responsible job to pass the vision on to future generations and encourage progressive youth today.

Not too ambitious when “ICO-TIN” is considered a revised version of the “origin of the species” “Nakamoto”. This paves the way for new experiments and the possibility of uniting the “two worlds” together.